Capital Budgeting Theory and Practice

Order

Order now 13, 2018

Abstract

Because over 85 percent of medical institutions are non-profit, the question of how they make choices on capital budgeting remains a fascinating one. As a part of the capital budgeting process, this paper aims to identify, choose, produce and post-audit numerous research papers. Because of the escalating expenses of healthcare, the limited resources available, and the intense competition among hospitals, planning for capital expenditures is an important part of running a medical facility. Because of this, it is essential that capital budgeting be conducted using the correct methods. A total of five publications were considered for this evaluation, each of which was broken down into sections focusing on the primary results, methodologies, limits, conclusions, and contributions of the authors. Finally, suggestions for future study were made based on an assessment of the gaps in existing literature related to the capital budgeting theory and a summary of the important results from the articles.

Method, analytics, and capital budgeting practice are some of the most often used terms.

Theory and practice of capital budgeting

The Articles Have Been Evaluated

The results of a poll conducted by the authors of the Evaluation Methods for Hospital Projects paper are summarized in this article. Project assessment techniques and different metrics of perceived project success were the main focus of the article, which focused on the empirical link between these two aspects of the project. Cost-benefit analysis and backing from senior management were found to be the most popular ways for hospital administrators to evaluate projects. Furthermore, research has shown that the support of the project’s top management may have an impact on the project’s overall performance (Buelow, Zuckweiler, & Rosacker, 2010).

Surveys will be conducted to examine if hospital administrators apply conventional project procedures when making decisions about particular possibilities for projects and managing chosen projects so that they may be put into action. A preferred project analysis approach utilized by project managers in the healthcare industry was also documented in the study. The rating of project approaches was used to explain why particular processes were used.

Is there anything I can do for you?

Every subject and topic is covered by our custom academic writing services.

See if there are any discounts available.

The study employed quantitative project assessment methodologies. These approaches were designed to assess the financial viability of a project’s monetary investments (Buelow et al., 2010). NPEC (Net Project Execution Cost), NPOV (Net Project Operation Value), and financial constraints are all included in this category. NPOV NPEC and the likelihood of completion were found to have no statistical link, according to the study’s conclusions. This includes the necessary prerequisites. These findings suggest that hospital administrators often use a variety of assessment techniques with the backing of senior management, which constitute the two primary approaches of project evaluation. By providing a valuable and practical guideline for both novice and experienced hospital administrators, this study’s findings may help both.

Brian Poplin’s paper, “Making Informed Capital Investment Decisions for Clinical Technology,” examines the strategic strategy.

nin g process of the hospital by incorporating the use of different data sources that support the smart capital planning. The objective of the research is to evaluate the current clinical equipment through the data-focused lens so that irregularities can be eliminated for hospitals. This is important when assessing if new equipment needs to be purchased or whether slightly aged equipment should be redeployed to other areas (Poplin, 2011). A case study was used to try to understand as well as analyze this concept. The case study offered a stronger perspective of where hospital activities concentrated on and how purchasing new and innovative technology may prove to be the cost efficient and effective approach for hospitals. The main findings of the research revealed that when determining the capital investment requirements, hospital managers determine equipment to be purchased and the Abstract

Because over 85 percent of medical institutions are non-profit, the question of how they make choices on capital budgeting remains a fascinating one. As a part of the capital budgeting process, this paper aims to identify, choose, produce and post-audit numerous research papers. Because of the escalating expenses of healthcare, the limited resources available, and the intense competition among hospitals, planning for capital expenditures is an important part of running a medical facility. Because of this, it is essential that capital budgeting be conducted using the correct methods. A total of five publications were considered for this evaluation, each of which was broken down into sections focusing on the primary results, methodologies, limits, conclusions, and contributions of the authors. Finally, suggestions for future study were made based on an assessment of the gaps in existing literature related to the capital budgeting theory and a summary of the important results from the articles.

Method, analytics, and capital budgeting practice are some of the most often used terms.

Theory and practice of capital budgeting

The Articles Have Been Evaluated

The results of a poll conducted by the authors of the Evaluation Methods for Hospital Projects paper are summarized in this article. Project assessment techniques and different metrics of perceived project success were the main focus of the article, which focused on the empirical link between these two aspects of the project. Cost-benefit analysis and backing from senior management were found to be the most popular ways for hospital administrators to evaluate projects. Furthermore, research has shown that the support of the project’s top management may have an impact on the project’s overall performance (Buelow, Zuckweiler, & Rosacker, 2010).

Surveys will be conducted to examine if hospital administrators apply conventional project procedures when making decisions about particular possibilities for projects and managing chosen projects so that they may be put into action. A preferred project analysis approach utilized by project managers in the healthcare industry was also documented in the study. The rating of project approaches was used to explain why particular processes were used.

Is there anything I can do for you?

Every subject and topic is covered by our custom academic writing services.

See if there are any discounts available.

The study employed quantitative project assessment methodologies. These approaches were designed to assess the financial viability of a project’s monetary investments (Buelow et al., 2010). NPEC (Net Project Execution Cost), NPOV (Net Project Operation Value), and financial constraints are all included in this category. NPOV NPEC and the likelihood of completion were found to have no statistical link, according to the study’s conclusions. This includes the necessary prerequisites. These findings suggest that hospital administrators often use a variety of assessment techniques with the backing of senior management, which constitute the two primary approaches of project evaluation. By providing a valuable and practical guideline for both novice and experienced hospital administrators, this study’s findings may help both.

Brian Poplin’s paper, “Making Informed Capital Investment Decisions for Clinical Technology,” examines the strategic strategy.

nin Abstract

Because over 85 percent of medical institutions are non-profit, the question of how they make choices on capital budgeting remains a fascinating one. As a part of the capital budgeting process, this paper aims to identify, choose, produce and post-audit numerous research papers. Because of the escalating expenses of healthcare, the limited resources available, and the intense competition among hospitals, planning for capital expenditures is an important part of running a medical facility. Because of this, it is essential that capital budgeting be conducted using the correct methods. A total of five publications were considered for this evaluation, each of which was broken down into sections focusing on the primary results, methodologies, limits, conclusions, and contributions of the authors. Finally, suggestions for future study were made based on an assessment of the gaps in existing literature related to the capital budgeting theory and a summary of the important results from the articles.

Method, analytics, and capital budgeting practice are some of the most often used terms.

Theory and practice of capital budgeting

The Articles Have Been Evaluated

The results of a poll conducted by the authors of the Evaluation Methods for Hospital Projects paper are summarized in this article. Project assessment techniques and different metrics of perceived project success were the main focus of the article, which focused on the empirical link between these two aspects of the project. Cost-benefit analysis and backing from senior management were found to be the most popular ways for hospital administrators to evaluate projects. Furthermore, research has shown that the support of the project’s top management may have an impact on the project’s overall performance (Buelow, Zuckweiler, & Rosacker, 2010).

Surveys will be conducted to examine if hospital administrators apply conventional project procedures when making decisions about particular possibilities for projects and managing chosen projects so that they may be put into action. A preferred project analysis approach utilized by project managers in the healthcare industry was also documented in the study. The rating of project approaches was used to explain why particular processes were used.

Is there anything I can do for you?

Every subject and topic is covered by our custom academic writing services.

See if there are any discounts available.

The study employed quantitative project assessment methodologies. These approaches were designed to assess the financial viability of a project’s monetary investments (Buelow et al., 2010). NPEC (Net Project Execution Cost), NPOV (Net Project Operation Value), and financial constraints are all included in this category. NPOV NPEC and the likelihood of completion were found to have no statistical link, according to the study’s conclusions. This includes the necessary prerequisites. These findings suggest that hospital administrators often use a variety of assessment techniques with the backing of senior management, which constitute the two primary approaches of project evaluation. By providing a valuable and practical guideline for both novice and experienced hospital administrators, this study’s findings may help both.

Brian Poplin’s paper, “Making Informed Capital Investment Decisions for Clinical Technology,” examines the strategic strategy.

nin

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.