Order by the 13th of this year. As a kind of media that serves the public rather than the commercial interests, Public Service Broadcasting (PSB) is used. Some nations’ communication societies mandate that particular radio and television stations achieve a set of standards before they may be granted licenses to transmit. Radio and television stations of the British Broadcasting Corporation, for example, have a mandate for public service, and this is also applied to stations that transmit in digital format (Cushion 2012, p.47). British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is an excellent example of a Public Service Corporation that relies only on licensing fees and does not often sell advertising time. At the time, it was one of Britain’s early public service broadcasting organizations. As a worldwide information provider, educator, and entertainer, this world-class media company’s purpose is defined by a variety of principles used in Public Service Broadcasting (PSB). In most situations, government entities manage Public Service Broadcasts, and the government places a degree of domestic coverage in order to support the public benefit in education, entertainment, and the dissemination of information. Broadcasters were able to focus their attention on domestic coverage with the creation of ITV in the 1950s because of rigorous government regulations (Cushion 2012, p.42). Public Service Broadcasters often carry cultural activities including religion and artistic programs, the local school system, and a variety of cultural behaviors that promote societal progress on a regular basis. The government owns most of the Public Service Broadcasts, which explains why it has complete control over them. Some stations are set up primarily to promote local culture, improve educational opportunities, or let members of the public gather data for a variety of objectives. Whether the Public Service Broadcasting System (PSB) still has a place in today’s media landscape is explored in this article, along with the many components that make up PSB.
Is there anything I can do for you?
Every subject and topic is covered by our custom academic writing services.
See if there are any discounts available. Television, radio, and other electronic media sources are all part of the Public Broadcast Corporation’s mission to serve the public (Hendy 2013, p.22). These institutes are often supported by government departments and the annual fees paid by recipients. Additionally, in the United States, the state and federal governments may provide extra funding to public broadcasters. Well-wishers and private corporations may also contribute to the financing of these media organizations. If a public broadcasting station is located in a foreign country, it may be able to operate both globally and domestically. With regards to the operation of Public Broadcasting, it is normally done in a single entity that is given complete authority by Government, or in other situations, the best bidder is awarded a contract to run these media companies (Henry 2007, p.51). Others have a slew of public broadcasters, each serving a certain area or speaking a different language. In the United Kingdom, for example, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) broadcasts in a variety of languages. East Africans who are fluent in Swahili are the primary audience for BBC Swahili’s programming. While it is common for regional branches of the Public Broadcasting to be formed, there is always a goal to promote cultural characteristics of those areas by broadcasting various cultural aspects in the local language of those regions. In the past, public broadcasting dominated numerous types of media transmission in many nations, except in the United States, where there were multiple media houses owing to the early acceptance of the freedom of the media. Many nations throughout the globe have seen a rise in commercial broadcasting in recent years. Toward the close of the twentieth century, the number of countries that relied primarily on public broadcasting decreased (Hendy 2013, p.22). A society’s socio-cultural values are protected by the Public Service Broadcasting Corporation. Human values are universally regarded as important by civilizations across the globe. It is via the Public Service Corporation that governments may realize their goals of social integration in the contemporary global social structure. Public service Broadcast Corporation (PSBC), a government-owned broadcaster, is a vital component of the government’s efforts to promote social inclusion. This media outlet does not make a lot of money from its operations since it focuses on the public good instead of profit. According to this definition, the mission of the Public Service Broadcasting Corporation is to instill cultural norms in the population at large. For example, the Public Service Broadcasting of Singapore has over seventy stations throughout the world that serve its people in the global viewpoint via the dissemination of cultural practices, which are normally broadcast worldwide. Tourists and foreigners who want to visit a certain nation for a variety of reasons are frequently assisted by Public Service Corporations. Support for minority groups, such as women, children, youth, and the elderly, is another social-cultural activity carried out by the Public Service Broadcasting Corporation. It empowers them and allows them to participate in society by exposing their interests. National or social identity may be established via the work of public broadcasting organizations (PBOs). A public interest group argues on behalf of the public and promotes the social benefits of the country or community to a regional or worldwide audience. It is also our job to keep the public informed about current events and provide them with up-to-date information that is essential to their knowledge of global concepts and to the public at large. There are educational programs for children, youth, and the general people in a specific nation that are aired on public broadcasts to encourage learning and diffusion of information. Despite all of these advantages, some have questioned whether the public broadcaster is still relevant in today’s society. As digital technology has advanced, many people have come to believe that this kind of transmission has been rendered obsolete by it. BBC, for example, is one of several public service broadcasts that continue to attract viewers and listeners from throughout the globe and in a variety of languages. The growth of the digital age has given rise to numerous questions concerning the future of the public service broadcasting across many countries around the world. Many public broadcast corporations have been disparaged by some experts as broadcasting the programs that can be aired by the commercial broadcasters. With the above scenario, the public broadcasters have been perceived as the media house that causes distortion in the market, a situation that makes it difficult for the commercial broadcasters to operate effectively. Although the public broadcasting corporations have the rich cultural backing that encourages them to continue operating, they need to provide new entertainment services that conform to the modern culture in order to remain relevant in the digital market. The world is changing very first and the introduction of the digital systems in the media industry has enhanced the promotion of the commercialized media houses that that apply the digital techniques in their operations, this makes the public broadcast corporation to remain irrelevant in the modern market.
The rise of the digital age is characterized by the over reliance on the internet to broadcast different programs to the people. In the modern times, the availability of the internet enables people to obtain different information from different sources without relying solely on the media houses. For instance, the cultural information can be obtained from different internet sources without necessarily focusing on the sources from the public broadcast corporations.
With the rise in the digital age, there are commercialized media houses that can relay real-time information before it gets into the studios and radio stations. Facebook is one of the social media sites where people can communicate and obtain the real first-hand information that may not be obtained from the public broadcast corporation. Before the rise of social media, there were biases in the some of the public broadcasts; this was due to the fact that the government had the full control of these media houses and there was some information that could not reach the public due to these strict measures that were observed by the government institutions. On the other hand, the rise of the digital age has influenced many people and currently, there are people who no longer rely not only on the public broadcast corporations but also on the modern commercialized media houses because they also exhibit some biases when it comes to the production of some important information. In most cases, the media houses are guided and they cannot produce the information that can eradicate the spirit of national and international integration. The public broadcasting corporations are not relevant in the modern digital system that is characterized by the modern cultural norms. With the first changing cultural trends, the public broadcasting corporation will be on the enormous shock as they will have no cultural values to air due to the fact that the world is becoming one and people are developing common cultures and different ways of life.
The public service broadcasters are not relevant today because the information they relay cannot reach many people in the regions where there are no distributions of their channels. The modern digital broadcasts are accessible in many geographical regions across the world, a situation that is making it efficient for the listeners to obtain first and reliable information (Uricchio 2009, p.59). The analog public broadcast continues to charge high prices amidst the competitive digital age that is characterized by the efficiency in the spread of information into both poor and efficient networked geographic regions. The reduction in the prices of the analog public broadcast would mean the reduction in their operation, a situation that can suddenly lead to their collapse. The above scenario, therefore, makes it hard for these media houses to thrive in the digital age where the efficiency, as well as the low costs, is maintained across the board. The ITV has been putting up more attempts to significantly reduce its obligations in producing and broadcasting non-profitable public service broadcast programming, indicating the increase in the competition posed by the multichannel and digital televisions across the world (Katz and Scannell 2009, p.25). Additionally, the Channel 4 has predicted the gaps in funding when they proceed with the public service broadcasting after the adoption of the digital system of broadcasting. The above scenario indicates that the rise of the digital broadcast has made it hard for the public broadcast to survive in the modern media market. There has been a consultation on the direction which the public service broadcast corporations can take amidst the modern competitive age, a situation whose solution proves difficult going by the current media market.
The public broadcasting corporations are finding it hard to justify their funding models due to the rise of a digital broadcast that serves numerous people across the world. The main aim of the government before the digital takeover was to ensure that the information reaches the maximum number of people within a short time; this was the reason behind the funding from the government institutions. On the other hand, due to the increase in the number of commercialized digital media, the number of people being served has increased significantly due to the access of different vital information sources (Uricchio 2009, p.59). It is also challenging for the public broadcasters to obtain financial businesses and individuals because their services are deemed by many people as obsolete and irrelevant in the modern systems. Businesses would prefer showcase their products in the digital platforms because that is where they will find numerous potential customers. The increase in the number of digital media houses has made it hard for the analog public broadcast due to the shared networks that sometimes favor the digital transmission. The main purpose of the digital system is to increase the efficiency of the transfer of information from one source to the other, a situation that has largely suppressed the analog system of information transmission solely applied by the public service broadcasts.
In conclusion, although the public broadcasting corporations have greatly promoted the societal integration of people in the global perspective, it is becoming irrelevant in the modern digital systems that are characterized by the efficiency in the transfer of information. The analog public broadcast corporations have been faced with mega financial challenges as well as the technical upheavals that are all characterized by the emergence of the digital systems of communication. Although some of them are still operating in these challenging environments, they are on the verge of collapse unless there is a miracle that can surpass the above situations. The solutions that can be found can only conform to the digital system of operation that is embraced by many digital systems in the current world.
Cushion, S., 2012. The democratic value of news: Why public service media matter. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hendy, D., 2013. Public service broadcasting. Palgrave Macmillan.
Henry, J., 2007. Transmedia Storytelling 101. Web log post. Confessions of an Aca-Fan. Henry Jenkins, 22.
Katz, E. and Scannell, P., 2009. The end of television?: Its impact on the world (so far) (Vol. 625). Sage.
Sjøvaag, H., Moe, H. and Stavelin, E., 2012. Public service news on the web: a large-scale content analysis of the Norwegian broadcasting corporation’s online news. Journalism Studies, 13(1), pp.90-106.
Uricchio, W., 2009. Contextualizing the broadcast era: Nation, commerce, and constraint. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and